Natural Philosophy
Natural philosophy was the study of nature prior to the widespread adoption of modern science and referred to the objective study of nature and the physical universe[4][5]. The term "natural philosophy" preceded the current term "science," where the word "science" was a synonym for knowledge or study, and the term "natural philosophy" referred to knowledge or study of "the workings of nature"[4].
Historical Origins and Development
Natural philosophy, as distinguished from metaphysics and mathematics, was traditionally understood to encompass a wide range of subjects which Aristotle included in the physical sciences and was the science of those beings which undergo change and are independent of human beings[1]. The Greeks were the first to seek reasonable explanations of natural phenomena that did not involve the arbitrary will of the gods[8], marking the beginning of systematic natural philosophical inquiry.
Natural philosophy emerged with Aristotle, who practiced an early form of science, though Pre-Socratic thinkers such as Anaximander, Democritus and Parmenides studied an early form of natural philosophy[5]. The vast field of inquiry was described in Aristotelian treatises such as Physics, On the Heavens, On Generation and Corruption, Meteorology, History of Animals, On the Parts of Animals, On the Generation of Animals, On the Soul, the so-called parva naturalia, and some apocrypha[1].
Medieval Period
In Europe, natural philosophy reached its height during the high and late Middle Ages (thirteenth and fourteenth centuries), after the rise of the university system[4]. Medieval universities fostered natural philosophy as part of their curriculum, merging it with theological studies, which led to debates about faith versus reason[6].
A distinct enterprise of thinking systematically about the natural world seemed worth undertaking in the thirteenth century, with its initial focus on the development of new uses for ancient works - especially those by Aristotle - in a religious struggle against heresy, and by the time the heretics had been defeated, natural philosophy had become a mainstay of education at the new institutions of learning called universities[7].
Renaissance Transformation
During the Renaissance, despite the enduring centrality of the Aristotelian paradigm for the discipline, natural philosophy was enriched and expanded by a number of further approaches[1]. By the end of the sixteenth century natural philosophy was no longer purely identified with the Aristotelian system or a standard university curriculum, and the proliferation of new contexts and ways of learning did not automatically eliminate older ones, contributing to the birth of modern science[1].
Scientific Revolution and Modern Transformation
The Scientific Revolution involved drastic change in scientific thought that took place during the 16th and 17th centuries, replacing the Greek view that had dominated science for almost 2,000 years[22]. Medieval scientific philosophy was abandoned in favor of the new methods proposed by Bacon, Galileo, Descartes, and Newton[28].
The primary contribution of the Scientific Revolution was its new ideal of knowledge, where it was argued by Francis Bacon and others that the fundamental criteria for true knowledge is the ability to produce effects in nature, and for the "new philosophers" of the 17th century, techne demonstrated episteme[26].
Natural philosophy became "science" when the acquisition of knowledge through experiments performed according to the scientific method became a specialized branch of study, beyond the type of observation, speculation, and logical analysis which takes place in philosophy, and forms of modern science historically developed out of natural philosophy[4].
Relationship with the Lunar Society of Birmingham
The Lunar Society of Birmingham was an informal club of natural philosophers, industrialists, and intellectuals that met monthly on the Monday nearest the full moon in and around Birmingham, England, from approximately 1765 to 1813, with core members including manufacturer Matthew Boulton, engineer James Watt, physician and poet Erasmus Darwin, chemist Joseph Priestley, and potter Josiah Wedgwood[11].
A crucial element in the "Midlands Enlightenment," they were pioneering natural philosophers (scientists), physicians, mechanical engineers, and manufacturers—"the fathers of the industrial revolution"[13]. The meetings held at Soho House were lively affairs, where all the latest ideas and inventions were discussed and scientific experiments carried out[12].
The Lunar Society was an example of like-minded men – or Lunarticks as they styled themselves – working together for a positive aim; to promote natural philosophy[18]. Their debates brought together philosophy, arts, science and commerce, and as well as debating and discovering, the 'Lunarticks' also built canals and factories, managed world-class businesses — and changed the face of Birmingham[15].
The society exemplified the practical application of natural philosophical principles during the Enlightenment period. The Lunar Society's scientific discussions centered on chemistry, with Joseph Priestley demonstrating his pneumatic trough apparatus to isolate and analyze gases during meetings in Birmingham after 1767[11]. Lunar members financed research with Watt aimed at beating Cavendish and Lavoisier to the discovery of H20, the formula of water[13].
Decline and Legacy
A better candidate for the end of natural philosophy is the 19th century, when the study of the natural world became professionalized and was no longer the province of the amateurish clergy-gentlemen but rather of the professional scientist centered at major research institutions, a change that rivals the Scientific Revolution itself[26].
At older universities, long-established Chairs of Natural Philosophy are today occupied mainly by physics professors[4], reflecting the discipline's evolution into modern physics and other specialized sciences. The field of physics used to be known as natural philosophy, as the term physics derives from the Greek physis, nature[3].
Natural philosophy's legacy continues in contemporary discussions about the relationship between science and broader philosophical questions. In metaphysics, natural philosophy is concerned with concepts of "creation science" and intelligent design, with the idea of the universe as an organic whole, and with the definition of the "supernatural world" and its relationship with the physical world, as some philosophers and scientists question whether a strict scientific methodology of experimentation, observation, and documentation can, by itself, provide an adequate understanding of physical reality[4].